The Witcher: Henry Cavill and Bloodborne Reviews by Fiction Fan Bombs

"The Witcher: Blood Origins" is being bombarded by Henry Cavill and fans of the novel, with Netflix scoring an all-time low on Rotten Tomatoes.

Many are still upset about the actor's departure from the mainline series, and The Witcher: Origins is being well received by Henry Cavill and fans of the novel alike. Developed by "The Witcher" writer Declan Debarra and showrunner Lauren S. Hissrich, the prequel revolves around various elves from the race's golden age on a vengeful journey while also exploring the infamy. The infamous "Confluence of Spheres" event and the first wizard. "The Witcher: Blood Origins," starring Sophia Brown and Michelle Yeoh, debuted on Netflix this Christmas, though it wasn't a huge hit in the eyes of many.

A few days after the show's premiere on Netflix, The Witcher: Blood Origins received its official Rotten Tomatoes score, the anchor's lowest score on the review platform. The prequel series has been bombarded by fans of Henry Cavill and the novel on the platform, and currently has an approval rating of only 9% of the site's audience. With a 36% approval rating from critics, "The Witcher: Blood Origins" is also the worst-reviewed entry in the history of the Netflix series so far.

Why Blood Origin Is Performing So Poorly

Although the general comment bombing seems to have stopped With fans from Cavill still furious that he was swapped for Geralt of Rivia by Liam Hemsworth, The Witcher: Blood Origin's pivotal score points to the show's many problems. Many reviews directed their critique at the generic formula of The Witcher prequels, drawing from well-worn fantasy genre tropes where a diverse group of people came together to explore, rather than doing something original with the material. Others felt that the dialogue was so heavily glossed over that even the most talented actor Michelle Yeoh had nothing to do to record a very memorable character.

One of the biggest complaints from critics and audiences about The Witcher: Origins seems to be that its story lacks any value in its own right, and exists only as a starting point for future series. The Witcher season 2 has also been criticized by some for launching projects like The Witcher: Blood Origins and other spinoffs, though critics have rated the season much higher than the prequel shows. However, as audience complaints remain focused on the show's divergent paths with Andrzej With Sapkowski's original novel reportedly influencing Cavill's decision to leave the role, The Witcher: Origins looks set to continue to pose a risk for the Netflix franchise.

Can The Witcher Season 3 Keep The Franchise Alive?

With viewers already divided after season 2, and now looking back at how The Witcher: Bloodborne bombed, the question now arises of whether The Witcher season 3 will keep the series alive. Swapping Cavill for Hemsworth will be a big selling point for season 4, but with Netflix expected to be in the Witcher: Nightmare of the Wolf and the family-friendly animated series Heathrich and Her Writers' Studio Expanding to a second animated feature later will have to sell audiences on their ability to stay true to the source material in future projects. Only time will tell when The Witcher season 3 premieres sometime in mid-2023.